Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind (JUH) Chief Mahmood Madani has sparked a major political and social storm after declaring that “wherever there is oppression, there will be jihad.” The remark, made during the organisation’s national governing body meeting in Bhopal, has drawn sharp criticism from political parties and right wing groups.
What Madani Said
Madani argued that the word “Jihad” has been wrongly portrayed as violent, while its true meaning in Islam is a struggle against injustice. He said that oppression whether Social, Legal or Institutional naturally leads to resistance and that this resistance is what Islam defines as “jihad.”
He further criticised recent court rulings, including those related to the Babri Masjid and Triple Talaq matters, claiming such verdicts have created fear that judicial institutions are working under government pressure. Madani also alleged that minorities are facing systemic discrimination through attacks on Islamic institutions, targeting of Muslim economic activity, and campaigns vilifying Islamic symbols.
Despite the strong words, Madani clarified that Muslims in India are committed to the Constitution and do not seek an Islamic state. He insisted that if constitutional protections fail, the responsibility lies with the government, not the citizens.
Strong Political Backlash
Madani’s remarks triggered immediate condemnation from leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), who accused him of making divisive statements that could inflame communal tensions. Several right wing organisations demanded legal action, alleging that he was inciting the community under the guise of religious terminology.
Some groups also criticised him for “misleading Muslim youth” and for challenging the credibility of constitutional institutions.
Why the Statement Matters
Madani’s comments have revived sensitive debates around:
- The interpretation of religious terms like “jihad” in a secular democracy
- Minority rights and judicial fairness
- The boundary between dissent and inflammatory speech
- Rising religious and political polarisation
Supporters argue his remarks highlight genuine concerns about discrimination. Critics claim the statement is provocative and risks deepening mistrust between communities.
What’s Next
The controversy is likely to escalate further, with political parties, civil society groups and legal experts expected to weigh in. There has been no official legal action yet, but demands for scrutiny are increasing.
Madani’s speech intended as a call for justice has instead opened a broader conversation on Identity, Constitutional integrity and The fragile balance of communal harmony in India.
